The abstract claims that state-of-the-art LLMs fail to infer contextual preferences from multi-turn interactions (under 50% precision, 65% recall), but the body text is an unrelated adversarial-patch paper, leaving the claim unsupported.
Maximal Brain Damage Without Data or Optimization: Disrupting Neural Networks via Sign-Bit Flips
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) can be catastrophically disrupted by flipping only a handful of parameter bits. We introduce Deep Neural Lesion (DNL), a data-free and optimizationfree method that locates critical parameters, and an enhanced single-pass variant, 1P-DNL, that refines this selection with one forward and backward pass on random inputs. We show that this vulnerability spans multiple domains, including image classification, object detection, instance segmentation, and reasoning large language models. In image classification, flipping just two sign bits in ResNet-50 on ImageNet reduces accuracy by 99.8%. In object detection and instance segmentation, one or two sign flips in the backbone collapse COCO detection and mask AP for Mask R-CNN and YOLOv8-seg models. In language modeling, two sign flips into different experts reduce Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking from 78% to 0% accuracy. We also show that selectively protecting a small fraction of vulnerable sign bits provides a practical defense against such attacks.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
CUPID: Evaluating Personalized and Contextualized Alignment of LLMs from Interactions
The abstract claims that state-of-the-art LLMs fail to infer contextual preferences from multi-turn interactions (under 50% precision, 65% recall), but the body text is an unrelated adversarial-patch paper, leaving the claim unsupported.