Extends PAC machine teaching to handle deductive errors by requiring teachers to select sets that lead to approximately correct hypotheses with high probability despite learner mistakes, with complexity results and LLM experiments.
Teaching with IMPACT
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Like many problems in AI in their general form, supervised learning is computationally intractable. We hypothesize that an important reason humans can learn highly complex and varied concepts, in spite of the computational difficulty, is that they benefit tremendously from experienced and insightful teachers. This paper proposes a new learning framework that provides a role for a knowledgeable, benevolent teacher to guide the process of learning a target concept in a series of "curricular" phases or rounds. In each round, the teacher's role is to act as a moderator, exposing the learner to a subset of the available training data to move it closer to mastering the target concept. Via both theoretical and empirical evidence, we argue that this framework enables simple, efficient learners to acquire very complex concepts from examples. In particular, we provide multiple examples of concept classes that are known to be unlearnable in the standard PAC setting along with provably efficient algorithms for learning them in our extended setting. A key focus of our work is the ability to learn complex concepts on top of simpler, previously learned, concepts---a direction with the potential of creating more competent artificial agents.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Teaching and Learning under Deductive Errors
Extends PAC machine teaching to handle deductive errors by requiring teachers to select sets that lead to approximately correct hypotheses with high probability despite learner mistakes, with complexity results and LLM experiments.