Experimental study (N=99) shows intellectual humility selectively lowers credibility ratings for pseudoscientific AI health content without improving AI source detection.
All That ' s ` Human ' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Text
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
representative citing papers
Humans detect AI-generated text at 87.6% accuracy across 9 languages and 9 domains, outperforming prior near-random results, and do not always prefer human-written text when the source is unclear.
citing papers explorer
-
Intellectual Humility as a Cognitive Filter for AI-Generated Health Misinformation. An Evolutionary Perspective on Epistemic Vigilance
Experimental study (N=99) shows intellectual humility selectively lowers credibility ratings for pseudoscientific AI health content without improving AI source detection.
-
Is Human-Like Text Liked by Humans? Multilingual Human Detection and Preference Against AI
Humans detect AI-generated text at 87.6% accuracy across 9 languages and 9 domains, outperforming prior near-random results, and do not always prefer human-written text when the source is unclear.
- Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Models