Three adhesion theories give stickiness criteria with the same main ingredients: rms roughness, longest roughness wavelength, and work of adhesion divided by elastic modulus.
Linking energy loss in soft adhesion to surface roughness
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
A mechanistic understanding of adhesion in soft materials is critical in the fields of transportation (tires, gaskets, seals), biomaterials, micro-contact printing, and soft robotics. Measurements have long demonstrated that the apparent work of adhesion coming into contact is consistently lower than the intrinsic work of adhesion for the materials, and that there is adhesion hysteresis during separation, commonly explained by viscoelastic dissipation. Still lacking is a quantitative experimentally validated link between adhesion and measured topography. Here, we used in situ measurements of contact size to investigate the adhesion behavior of soft elastic polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) hemispheres (modulus ranging from 0.7 to 10 MPa) on four different polycrystalline diamond substrates with topography characterized across eight orders of magnitude, including down to the \r{A}ngstr\"om-scale. The results show that the reduction in apparent work of adhesion is equal to the energy required to achieve conformal contact. Further, the energy loss during contact and removal is equal to the product of intrinsic work of adhesion and the true contact area. These findings provide a simple mechanism to quantitatively link the widely-observed adhesion hysteresis to roughness rather than viscoelastic dissipation.
fields
cond-mat.soft 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Universal features in "stickiness" criteria for soft adhesion with rough surfaces
Three adhesion theories give stickiness criteria with the same main ingredients: rms roughness, longest roughness wavelength, and work of adhesion divided by elastic modulus.