Pith. sign in

Towards Fine-grained Causal Reasoning and QA

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Understanding causality is key to the success of NLP applications, especially in high-stakes domains. Causality comes in various perspectives such as enable and prevent that, despite their importance, have been largely ignored in the literature. This paper introduces a novel fine-grained causal reasoning dataset and presents a series of novel predictive tasks in NLP, such as causality detection, event causality extraction, and Causal QA. Our dataset contains human annotations of 25K cause-effect event pairs and 24K question-answering pairs within multi-sentence samples, where each can have multiple causal relationships. Through extensive experiments and analysis, we show that the complex relations in our dataset bring unique challenges to state-of-the-art methods across all three tasks and highlight potential research opportunities, especially in developing "causal-thinking" methods.

citation-role summary

other 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

other 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage? cs.AI · 2025-06-26 · conditional · none · ref 69 · internal anchor

    LLMs perform much worse on causal questions built from post-cutoff news articles, suggesting their apparent causal skill is mostly memorization, and a general-knowledge prompt method only partly closes the gap.