A six-dimension framework shows structural failures in four governance principles under radical capability asymmetry, with two requiring new normative theory and a pattern of interdependent breakdown.
Oxford University Press, Oxford
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
The paper claims that alignment requires treating AI as part of the self through cognitive co-regulation, identifying risks like deskilling and automation bias while drawing on System 0 cognition theory.
citing papers explorer
-
Cognitive Comparability and the Limits of Governance: Evaluating Authority Under Radical Capability Asymmetry
A six-dimension framework shows structural failures in four governance principles under radical capability asymmetry, with two requiring new normative theory and a pattern of interdependent breakdown.
-
Position: AI as Part of Self -- Extending the Mind Requires Cognitive Co-Regulation
The paper claims that alignment requires treating AI as part of the self through cognitive co-regulation, identifying risks like deskilling and automation bias while drawing on System 0 cognition theory.