The Gray Cycle Realizes the 8-Tick Cycle
A 3-bit Gray code with single-bit transitions gives the minimal recognition cycle
A 3-bit Gray code with single-bit transitions gives the minimal recognition cycle.
Predictions
| Quantity | Predicted | Units | Empirical | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum cycle length | 8 |
ticks | 8 |
Forced by D=3 Gray code |
Equations
[ J(xy)+J(x/y)=2J(x)J(y)+2J(x)+2J(y) ]
Recognition Composition Law.
Derivation chain (Lean anchors)
Each row links to the corresponding Lean 4 declaration in the Recognition Science canon. A resolved anchor has a green check; an unresolved anchor flags a registry/canon mismatch.
-
1 Eight-tick minimum theorem checked
IndisputableMonolith.Patterns.GrayCycle.grayCover_eight_tick_minOpen theorem → -
2 Gray cycle 3 has period 8 theorem checked
IndisputableMonolith.Patterns.GrayCycle.grayCycle3_periodOpen theorem → -
3 Bijective Gray cycle theorem checked
IndisputableMonolith.Patterns.GrayCycle.grayCycle3_bijectiveOpen theorem → -
4 One-bit step theorem checked
IndisputableMonolith.Patterns.GrayCycle.grayCycle3_oneBit_stepOpen theorem →
Narrative
1. Setting
The Gray Cycle Realizes the 8-Tick Cycle is anchored in Patterns.GrayCycle. The page is not a loose explainer: it is a public map from the Recognition Science forcing chain into one Lean-checked declaration bundle. The primary anchor determines what is proved, and the surrounding declarations show how the result is used.
2. Equations
(E1)
$$ J(xy)+J(x/y)=2J(x)J(y)+2J(x)+2J(y) $$
Recognition Composition Law.
3. Prediction or structural target
- Minimum cycle length: predicted 8 (ticks); empirical 8. Source: Forced by D=3 Gray code
This page is currently a structural derivation. Where the claim has direct empirical content, the prediction table gives the measurable target; otherwise the claim is a formal bridge inside the Lean canon.
4. Formal anchor
The primary anchor is Patterns.GrayCycle..grayCover_eight_tick_min.
theorem grayCover_eight_tick_min {T : Nat} [NeZero T] (w : GrayCover 3 T) : 8 ≤ T := by
simpa using (Patterns.eight_tick_min (T := T) w.path w.complete)
/-!
### A fully explicit, fully decidable 3-bit witness (the actual “octave”)
This gives a *rigorous* Gray cycle for `d=3` (period 8) without any axioms.
We deliberately start here because it is the “octave” case used throughout RS.
-/
5. What is inside the Lean module
Key theorems:
OneBitDiff_symmgrayCover_min_ticksgrayCover_eight_tick_mingray8At_injectivetoNat3_pattern3pattern3_injectivegrayCycle3_injectivegrayCycle3_bijectivegrayCycle3_surjectivegrayCycle3_oneBit_stepgrayCycle3_period
Key definitions:
OneBitDiffGrayCycleGrayCoverpattern3gray8AtgrayCycle3PathtoNat3grayCycle3
6. Derivation chain
grayCover_eight_tick_min- Eight-tick minimumgrayCycle3_period- Gray cycle 3 has period 8grayCycle3_bijective- Bijective Gray cyclegrayCycle3_oneBit_step- One-bit step
7. Falsifier
A Lean-checkable counterexample to the named theorem or to the upstream functional equation refutes this derivation.
8. Where this derivation stops
Below this page the chain reduces to the RS forcing sequence: J-cost uniqueness, phi forcing, the eight-tick cycle, and the D=3 recognition substrate. If any upstream theorem changes, this page must be versioned rather than patched silently. The published URL is stable, but the version field is the contract.
10. Audit path
To audit gray-cycle-eight-tick, start with the primary Lean anchor Patterns.GrayCycle.grayCover_eight_tick_min. Then inspect the theorem names listed in the module-content section. The page is intentionally built so the public explanation is not a substitute for the proof object; it is a map into it. The mathematical dependency is the same in every case: reciprocal cost fixes J, J fixes the phi-ladder, the eight-tick cycle fixes the recognition clock, and the domain theorem listed above supplies the last step. If that last step is empirical, the falsifier section names what observation would break it. If that last step is formal, a Lean-checkable counterexample is the relevant failure mode.
Falsifier
A Lean-checkable counterexample to the named theorem or to the upstream functional equation refutes this derivation.
References
-
lean
Recognition Science Lean library (IndisputableMonolith)
https://github.com/jonwashburn/shape-of-logic
Public Lean 4 canon used by Pith theorem pages. -
paper
Uniqueness of the Canonical Reciprocal Cost
Peer-reviewed paper anchoring the J-cost uniqueness theorem. -
empirical
Forced by D=3 Gray code
Empirical reference for prediction: Minimum cycle length
How to cite this derivation
- Stable URL:
https://pith.science/derivations/gray-cycle-eight-tick - Version: 5
- Published: 2026-05-14
- Updated: 2026-05-15
- JSON:
https://pith.science/derivations/gray-cycle-eight-tick.json - YAML source:
pith/derivations/registry/bulk/gray-cycle-eight-tick.yaml
@misc{pith-gray-cycle-eight-tick,
title = "The Gray Cycle Realizes the 8-Tick Cycle",
author = "Recognition Physics Institute",
year = "2026",
url = "https://pith.science/derivations/gray-cycle-eight-tick",
note = "Pith Derivations, version 5"
}