Pith. sign in

Reference change · event page

Reference changes · DOI

Correction to: Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Measures for Scientific Text Simplification

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 1 open · 1 total · 0 disputed
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-72437-4_5
Notice DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-72437-4_25
Event date
2024-11-14
Machine twin
JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open
Resource for Error Analysis in Text Simplification: New Taxonomy and Test Collection

ref [1] · 2505.16392 · notice #9177 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Dennis Davari, Liana Ermakova, and Ralf Krestel. 2024. Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Measures for Scientific Text Simplification. In Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries - 28th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2024, Ljubljana, Slovenia, September 24-27, SIGIR ’25, July 13–18,2025, Padua, Italy Benjamin Vendeville, Liana Ermakova, and Pierre De Loor 2024, Proceedings, Part I (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 15177) , Apostolos Antonacopoulos, Annika Hinze, Benjamin Piwowarski, Mickaël Coustaty, Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio, Francesco Gelati, and Nicholas Vanderschantz (Eds.). Springer, 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72437-4_5

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

Dennis Davari, Liana Ermakova, and Ralf Krestel. 2024. Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Measures for Scientific Text Simplification. In Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries - 28th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2024, Ljubljana, Slovenia, September 24-27, SIGIR ’25, July 13–18,2025, Padua, Italy Benjamin Vendeville, Liana Ermakova, and Pierre De Loor 2024, Proceedings, Part I (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 15177), Apostolos Antonacopoulos, Annika Hinze, Benjamin Piwowarski, Mickaël Coustaty, Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio, Francesco Gelati, and Nicholas Vanderschantz (Eds.). Springer, 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72437-4_5

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.