Reference change · event page

Crowdsourcing Versus the Laboratory: Towards Human-Centered Experiments Using the Crowd

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 1 open · 1 total · 0 disputed

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66435-4_2
Notice DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66435-4_8
Event date: 2017-11-13
Machine twin: JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open

In Crowd Veritas: Leveraging Human Intelligence To Fight Misinformation

ref [188] · 2506.09221 · notice #9010 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Ujwal Gadiraju, Sebastian Möller, Martin Nöllenburg, Dietmar Saupe, Sebastian Egger-Lampl, Daniel Archambault, and Brian Fisher. Crowdsourcing Versus the Laboratory: Towards Human-Centered Experiments Using the Crowd. In Daniel Archambault, Helen Purchase, and Tobias Hoßfeld, editors,Evaluation in the Crowd. Crowdsourcing and Human-Centered Experiments, pages 6–26. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017. ISBN 978-3-319-66435-4. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66435-4_2

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.