Reference change · event page

Wait for it: identifying "On-Hold" self-admitted technical debt.Empirical Software Engineering

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 2 open · 2 total · 0 disputed

DOI: 10.1007/s10664-020-09854-3
Notice DOI: 10.1007/s10664-021-09939-7
Event date: 2021-03-16
Machine twin: JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open

Self-Admitted Technical Debt Detection Approaches: A Decade Systematic Review

ref [43] · 2312.15020 · notice #2953 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Maipradit R, Treude C, Hata H, Matsumoto K. Wait for it: identifying "On-Hold" self-admitted technical debt.Empirical Software Engineering. 2020;25(5):3770–3798. doi: 10.1007/s10664-020-09854-3

Correction Open

Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg: Understanding SATD in Dockerfiles through the Lens of Co-evolution

ref [41] · 2605.21238 · notice #2952 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Maipradit, R., Treude, C., Hata, H., Matsumoto, K.: Wait for it: identifying “On-Hold” self-admitted technical debt. Empirical Software Engineering25(5), 3770–3798 (2020). DOI 10.1007/s10664-020-09854-3. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09854 -3

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.