Reference change · event page

The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials , journal =

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 1 open · 1 total · 0 disputed

DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100443
Notice DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100450
Event date: 2019-09-12
Machine twin: JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open

Illusions of the Gold Standard: A Large-scale Analysis of Human Evaluation Protocols for Long-form Text Generation

ref [99] · 2606.07936 · notice #7635 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Matthew Michelson and Katja Reuter , keywords =. The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials , journal =. 2019 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100443 , url =

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

Matthew Michelson and Katja Reuter, keywords =. The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials, journal =. 2019, issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100443, url =

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.