Pith. sign in

Reference change · event page

Reference changes · DOI

Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 4 open · 4 total · 0 disputed
DOI
10.1186/2046-4053-4-5
Notice DOI
10.1186/s13643-015-0031-5
Event date
2015-06-18
Machine twin
JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open
Trends in AI and Human-AI Interaction in Clinical Trials -- A Hybrid Human-AI Exploration

ref [22] · 2605.29096 · notice #6886 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

O’Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, Miwa M , Ananiadou S. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches . Systematic Reviews. 2015; 4, 5, doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-5

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

O’Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, Miwa M, Ananiadou S. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches . Systematic Reviews. 2015; 4, 5, doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-5

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.