Reference change · event page

Performance of several types of beta-binomial models in comparison to standard approaches for meta-analyses with very few studies

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 1 open · 1 total · 0 disputed

DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01779-3
Notice DOI: 10.1186/s12874-026-02781-9
Event date: 2026-02-17
Machine twin: JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open

A beta-binomial model respecting randomization and its comparison to the standard beta-binomial model that ignores randomization for the meta-analysis of rare events

ref [11] · 2606.27971 · notice #319 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Felsch M, Beckmann L, Bender R, et al. Performance of several types of beta-binomial models in comparison to standard approaches for meta-analyses with very few studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2022; 22: 319. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01779-3. 80

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.