Reference change · event page

PLoS medicine 2(8), 124 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 16 open · 16 total · 0 disputed

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Notice DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004085
Event date: 2022-08-25
Machine twin: JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open

Balancing Evidentiary Value and Sample Size of Adaptive Designs with Application to Animal Experiments

ref [27] · 2511.17292 · notice #2873 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

J. P. A. Ioannidis. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine , 2 0 (8): 0 e124, 2005. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

J. P. A. Ioannidis. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2 0 (8): 0 e124, 2005. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Correction Open

Visible, Trackable, Forkable: Opening the Process of Science

ref [2] · 2604.10932 · notice #2872 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

John P. A. Ioannidis. Why most published research findings are false.PLoS Medicine, 2(8):e124, 2005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Correction Open

From Papers to Progress: Rethinking Knowledge Accumulation in Software Engineering

ref [13] · 2604.16208 · notice #2871 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

John P. A. Ioannidis. 2005. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLOS Medicine2, 8 (2005), e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Correction Open

Read the Paper, Write the Code: Agentic Reproduction of Social-Science Results

ref [1] · 2604.21965 · notice #2870 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Accessed: 2026-03-31. John P . A. Ioannidis. Why most published research findings are false.PLoS Medicine, 2(8): e124, 2005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Haitao Li, Qian Dong, Junjie Chen, Huixue Su, Yujia Zhou, Qingyao Ai, Ziyi Ye, and Yiqun Liu. Llms-as-judges: a comprehensive survey on llm-based evaluation methods.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05579, 2024. Chris Lu, Cong Lu, Robert Tjarko Lange, Jakob Foerster, Jeff Clune, and David Ha. The AI scientist: Towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery, 2024. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2408.06292. Olivia Miske, Anna Lou Abatayo, Mason Daley, Mirka Dirzo, Nicholas Fox, Noah Haber, Krystal M Hahn, Melissa Kline Struhl, Brinna Mawhinney, Priya Silverstein, Theresa Stankov, Andrew H Tyner, Matúš Adamkoviˇ c, Shilaan Alzahawi, Saule Anafinova, Eli Awtrey, Erick Axxe, James Bailey, Bert N Bakker, Akshaya Balaji, Gabriel Banik, Fran- tišek Bartoš, Henk Berkman, Zachariah Berry, Felix S Bethke, Timothy F Brady, Nate Breznau, Sara Capitan, Tabaré Capitán, Laura Caquelin, Kent Jason Cheng, William J Chopik, Gwen-Jiro Clochard, Tom Coupé, Jamie Cummins, Elif Gizem Demirag Burak, Jianhua Duan, Kevin M Esterling, Thomas R Evans, Nat

Correction Open

Sound Agentic Science Requires Adversarial Experiments

ref [11] · 2604.22080 · notice #2869 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Epub 2005-08-30. Erratum in: PLoS Med. 2022 Aug 25;19(8):e1004085. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004085. Nikita Mehandru, Amanda K. Hall, Olesya Melnichenko, Yulia Dubinina, Daniel Tsirulnikov, David Bamman, Ahmed Alaa, Scott Saponas, and Venkat S. Malladi. Bioagents: Bridging the gap in bioinformatics analysis with multi-agent systems.Scientific Reports, 15(1), November

Correction Open

Sound Agentic Science Requires Adversarial Experiments

ref [11] · 2604.22080 · notice #2874 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Epub 2005-08-30. Erratum in: PLoS Med. 2022 Aug 25;19(8):e1004085. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004085. Nikita Mehandru, Amanda K. Hall, Olesya Melnichenko, Yulia Dubinina, Daniel Tsirulnikov, David Bamman, Ahmed Alaa, Scott Saponas, and Venkat S. Malladi. Bioagents: Bridging the gap in bioinformatics analysis with multi-agent systems.Scientific Reports, 15(1), November

Correction Open

Nothing Deceives Like Success: Social Learning and the Illusion of Understanding in Science

ref [12] · 2604.27188 · notice #2868 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

J. P. A. Ioannidis, Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.PLOS Medicine2(8), e124 (2005), doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Nothing Deceives Like Success29

Correction Open

Sibyl-AutoResearch: Autonomous Research Needs Self-Evolving Trial-and-Error Harnesses, Not Paper Generators

ref [17] · 2605.22343 · notice #2875 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

John P. A. Ioannidis. Why most published research findings are false.PLoS Medicine, 2 (8):e124, August 2005. ISSN 1549-1676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Correction Open

Verifiable Benchmarking of Long-Horizon Spatial Biology

ref [29] · 2605.28065 · notice #2883 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Ioannidis, J. P. A. Why most published research find- ings are false.PLOS Medicine2, e124 (2005).https: //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Correction Open

Quantifying Evidential Rigor in Meta-Analytic Corpora: A Simulation-Characterized, Bias-Robust Bayesian Workflow with a Nutrition Case Study

ref [46] · 2606.01428 · notice #2881 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

John P. A. Ioannidis. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2 0 (8): 0 e124, 2005. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Correction Open

Traxia: A Framework for Verifiable, Agent-Native Scientific Publishing

ref [19] · 2606.08256 · notice #2880 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

John P. A. Ioannidis. Why most published research findings are false.PLOS Medicine, 2(8): e124, 2005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Correction Open

The Shift Toward Open and Reproducible AI Research

ref [1] · 2606.16974 · notice #2882 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Ioannidis, J.P.: Why most published research findings are false. PLoS medicine 2(8), 124 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Correction Open

The Shift Toward Open and Reproducible AI Research

ref [1] · 2606.16974 · notice #2878 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Ioannidis, J.P.: Why most published research findings are false. PLoS medicine 2(8), 124 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Correction Open

Learning Nonlinear Dynamics: Improving the Estimation Efficiency and Reliability of Gaussian Process State-Space Models

ref [296] · 2606.24691 · notice #2876 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Ioannidis, John P. A. , year = 2005, month = aug, journal =. Why. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 , urldate =

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

Ioannidis, John P. A., year = 2005, month = aug, journal =. Why. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124, urldate =

Correction Open

Thinking Like a Scientist? A Structural Study of LLM-Generated Research Methods

ref [19] · 2606.26130 · notice #2879 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Why most published research findings are false , author=. PLoS medicine , volume=. 2005 , publisher=. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 , issn =

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

Why most published research findings are false, author=. PLoS medicine, volume=. 2005, publisher=. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124, issn =

Correction Open

scBench-Long: Verifiable Benchmarking of Long-Horizon Single-Cell Biology

ref [39] · 2606.26563 · notice #2877 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Ioannidis, J. P. A. Why most published research find- ings are false.PLOS Medicine2, e124 (2005).https: //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.