Reference change · event page
Reference changes · DOI
Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.
This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.
ref [70] · 2405.11028 · notice #5167 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Ma, L., & Fuller, J. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 952, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74
ref [39] · 2605.24664 · notice #5173 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Ma, L., & Fuller, J. 2023, ApJ, 952, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74
ref [65] · 2605.25980 · notice #5172 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Ma, L., Fuller, J.: Tidal Spin-up of Black Hole Progenitor Stars. The Astrophys- ical Journal952, 53 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74
ref [70] · 2606.06209 · notice #5170 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Ma, L.; Fuller, J. Tidal Spin-up of Black Hole Progenitor Stars.Astrophys. J.2023,952, 53, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2305.08356]. [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 965, (2024)], https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74
ref [188] · 2606.18081 · notice #5169 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Tidal Spin-up of Black Hole Progenitor Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74 , archivePrefix =. 2305.08356 , primaryClass =
Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)
Tidal Spin-up of Black Hole Progenitor Stars., keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74, archivePrefix =. 2305.08356, primaryClass =
ref [60] · 2606.23773 · notice #5168 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Ma, Linhao and Fuller, Jim. Tidal Spin-up of Black Hole Progenitor Stars. Astrophys. J. 2023. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74. arXiv:2305.08356
ref [27] · 2606.27852 · notice #5171 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Ma, L., & Fuller, J. 2023, ApJ, 952, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74
Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.