Pith. sign in

Reference change · event page

Reference changes · DOI

Framework for Im- proving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity (CSF 2.0),

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Withdrawal Crossref 1 open · 1 total · 0 disputed
DOI
10.6028/nist.cswp.27
Notice DOI
10.6028/nist.cswp.27
Event date
2022-10-24
Machine twin
JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Withdrawal Open
Future-Proofing Cloud Security Against Quantum Attacks: Risk, Transition, and Mitigation Strategies

ref [24] · 2509.15653 · notice #80 · dispute

Raw extraction · citation context

This study employs a structured risk assessment methodol- ogy, adhering to the principles delineated in National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800- 30 [23], to systematically evaluate the security risks associated with CC transitions to quantum-safe systems. To enhance cybersecurity resilience, this research also integrates the NIST Cybersecurity Framework [24], ensuring alignment with in- dustry best practices for risk-based security management. A similar NIST-aligned methodology has been applied in other contributions, demonstrating its applicability across different quantum-era security domains [25], [26]. The risk assessment process itself is a four-phase approach, encompassing prepara- tion, conduct, communication, and maintenance.

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

This study employs a structured risk assessment methodol- ogy, adhering to the principles delineated in National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800- 30 [23], to systematically evaluate the security risks associated with CC transitions to quantum-safe systems. To enhance cybersecurity resilience, this research also integrates the NIST Cybersecurity Framework [24], ensuring alignment with in- dustry best practices for risk-based security management. A similar NIST-aligned methodology has been applied in other contributions, demonstrating its applicability across different quantum-era security domains [25], [26]. The risk assessment process itself is a four-phase approach, encompassing prepara- tion, conduct, communication, and maintenance

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.