Recoverable Identifier

arXiv:2604.22142 · detector doi_compliance · incontrovertible · 2026-05-20 00:14:09.418943+00:00

advisory doi_compliance recoverable_identifier

DOI in the printed bibliography is fragmented by whitespace or line breaks. A longer candidate (10.1038/s41599-025-05986-3Pennebaker) was visible in the surrounding text but could not be confirmed against doi.org as printed.

Paper page Integrity report arXiv Try DOI

Evidence text

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41599-025-05986-3 Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. University of Texas at Austin. Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1296–1312. Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves.Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–577. 8 Stamatatos, E. (2009). A survey of modern authorship attribution methods.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 538–556. Williams, C. B. (1940). A note on the statistical analysis of sentence-length as a criterion of literary style.Biometrika, 31(3/4), 356–361. Yule, G. U. (1944).The Statistical Study of Literary Vocabulary. Cambridge University Press. 9

Evidence payload

{
  "printed_excerpt": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41599-025-05986-3 Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. University of Texas at Austin. Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). ",
  "reconstructed_doi": "10.1038/s41599-025-05986-3Pennebaker",
  "ref_index": 2,
  "resolved_title": null,
  "verdict_class": "incontrovertible"
}