Citation notice #10063 · 2026-08-14 06:18:05.620620+00:00
Demand Forecasting in the Presence of Systematic Events: Cases in Capturing Sales Promotions
cites Table 6 clearly indicates the outstanding improvements using different measures such as MSAE (59% improvement), MAE (55% improvement), and MAPE (14% improvement), which carries a correction notice dated 2021-05-19. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.
Citing paper Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes
01Evidence
Raw extraction · bibliography line · bibliography index 9
As illustrated in Figures 6-8 and the summary results reported in Table 6, the FSE model significantly improves the forecast accuracy when compared to Company B’s judgmentally adjusted forecasts. Table 6 clearly indicates the outstanding improvements using different measures such as MSAE (59% improvement), MAE (55% improvement), and MAPE (14% improvement). Figure 6: Absolute errors of forecasts compared to actual sales 0 50 100 150 200 105 110 115 120 Weeks Absolute Errors (Unit) Company B's Adjusted ForecastsFSE Model Forecasts 22 Figure 7: Relative errors of forecasts compared to actual sales Figure 8: Comparison of the two forecasts and actual sales in the test-set period 0 30 60 90 105 110 115 120 Weeks Relative Errors (%) Comapny B's Adjusted ForecastsFSE Model Forecasts 0 100 200 300 400 105 110 115 120 Weeks Demand (Units) Actual Sales Comapny B's Adjusted ForecastsFSE Model Forecasts 23 Table 6: Forecasting accuracy improvement in the test-set period Measure of Error Company B’s Adjusted Forecasts The FSE Model Forecasts Improvement in Accuracy MSAE 0.32 0.13 59% MAE 30.88 13.62 55% MAPE 48.60 41.65 14% 5 Conclusions In this paper, we propose a time series regression model
02Event
- Type
- Correction
- Source
- Crossref
- Original DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2017.12.006
- Notice DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.01.024
- Date
- 2021-05-19
- Title
- Erratum regarding missing Declaration of Competing Interest statements in previously published articles
- Reasons
- ['Erratum']
- Work
- Table 6 clearly indicates the outstanding improvements using different measures such as MSAE (59% improvement), MAE (55% improvement), and MAPE (14% improvement) (2016)
03Dispute this notice
If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.