Pith. sign in

Citation notice #526 · 2026-07-11 03:18:50.152523+00:00

Agentivism: a learning theory for the age of artificial intelligence

Correction Crossref Open

cites Generative AI Without Guardrails Can Harm Learning: Evidence from High School Mathemat- ics, which carries a correction notice dated 2025-08-20. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.

This is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Citing paper Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes

01Evidence

Raw extraction · citation context · bibliography index 45

https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1821936116. 20 [44] Bastani H, Bastani O, Sungu A, Ge H, Kabakci O, Mariman R. Generative AI Without Guardrails Can Harm Learning: Evidence from High School Mathemat- ics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2025;122(26):e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122. [45] Liu M, Wu Z, Dai H, Su Y, Malik L, Liao J, et al. Enhancing self-directed learning and Python mastery through integration of a large language model and learning analytics dashboard. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2025;https:// doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70005. [46] Hu W, Gong R, Wu S, Li Y. A conversational agent based on contin- gent teaching model to support collaborative learning activities: impacts on

02Event

Type
Correction
Source
Crossref
Original DOI
10.1073/pnas.2422633122
Notice DOI
10.1073/pnas.2518204122
Date
2025-08-20
Title
Correction for Bastani et al., Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics
Reasons
['Correction']
Work
Generative AI Without Guardrails Can Harm Learning: Evidence from High School Mathemat- ics (2025) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Schema constants (for re-runners): correction · crossref

03Dispute this notice

If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.