Pith. sign in

Citation notice #6990 · 2026-07-11 06:31:24.856145+00:00

AI Washing Inflates Expected Performance but Not Interaction Outcomes: An AI Placebo Study Using Fitts' Law

Correction Crossref Open

cites Simkute, L, which carries a correction notice dated 2024-03-06. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.

This is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Citing paper Cited paper on Pith Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes

01Evidence

Raw extraction · citation context · bibliography index 39

indicatorMcDonald's 𝜔 ranged from .781 to .803 within conditions. Averaging across conditions, we achieved Cronbach's𝛼 of .693, and 𝜔 of 0.781, indicating that the NASA-TLX provides a reasonably reliable measure of subjective workload. 2.4.3 SUS-DE-Pos.To assess perceived usability-how intuitive and easy the system is to operate-we used the SUS-DE-Pos [39]. This version builds on Rummel's German System Usability Scale [41], reformulating all negative items into positive wording. We employed it to evaluate whether the same physical mouse interaction is experienced as more or less usable depending on the described experimental condition. Its development included language expert review and preregistered psychometric testing in two large-scale studies (𝑁>1100).

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

indicatorMcDonald's 𝜔 ranged from .781 to .803 within conditions. Averaging across conditions, we achieved Cronbach's𝛼 of .693, and 𝜔 of 0.781, indicating that the NASA-TLX provides a reasonably reliable measure of subjective workload. 2.4.3 SUS-DE-Pos.To assess perceived usability-how intuitive and easy the system is to operate-we used the SUS-DE-Pos [39]. This version builds on Rummel's German System Usability Scale [41], reformulating all negative items into positive wording. We employed it to evaluate whether the same physical mouse interaction is experienced as more or less usable depending on the described experimental condition. Its development included language expert review and preregistered psychometric testing in two large-scale studies (𝑁>1100)

02Event

Type
Correction
Source
Crossref
Original DOI
10.1080/10447318.2024.2307670
Notice DOI
10.1080/10447318.2024.2327167
Date
2024-03-06
Title
Correction
Reasons
['Correction']
Work
Simkute, L (2025)

Schema constants (for re-runners): correction · crossref

03Dispute this notice

If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.