Citation notice #7003 · 2026-07-11 06:31:24.856145+00:00
Measuring Machine Companionship: Scale Development and Validation for AI Companions
Correction
Crossref
Open
cites Simkute, L, which carries a correction notice dated 2024-03-06. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.
Citing paper Cited paper on Pith Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes
01Evidence
Raw extraction · bibliography line · bibliography index 2
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2375797 Seibt, J., Vestergaard, C., & Damholdt, M. F. (2020). Sociomorphing, not anthropomorphizing: Towards a typology of experienced sociality. Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2020. 335, pp. 51-67. IOS Press. Shank, D. B. (2025). Providing companionship. In The machine penalty (pp. 171- 191). Springer. Sherry, A., & Henson, R. K. (2005). Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(1), 37-48. Simondon, G. (1958/2017). On the mode of existence of technical objects. (C. Malaspina, & J. Rogove, Trans.) Univocal. Singles in America. (2025). The great relationship reset: What 5,000 singles taught us about connection. https://www.singlesinamerica.com/ Starke, C., Ventura, A., Bersch, C., Cha, M., de Vreese, C., Doebler, P., . . . Köbis, N. (2024). Risks and protective measures for synthetic relationships. Nature Human Behavior, 8, 1834-1836. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02005-4 Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135. Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions
02Event
- Type
- Correction
- Source
- Crossref
- Original DOI
- 10.1080/10447318.2024.2307670
- Notice DOI
- 10.1080/10447318.2024.2327167
- Date
- 2024-03-06
- Title
- Correction
- Reasons
- ['Correction']
- Work
- Simkute, L (2025)
03Dispute this notice
If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.