Pith. sign in

Citation notice #9205 · 2026-08-07 18:18:07.135794+00:00

Strategic Reflectivism In Intelligent Systems

Correction Crossref Open

cites Cognition 192, (November 2019), which carries a correction notice dated 2019-10-26. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.

This is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Citing paper Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes

01Evidence

Raw extraction · bibliography line · bibliography index 18

Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deon-tological and utilitarian tendencies. Cognition 192, (November 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.007

02Event

Type
Correction
Source
Crossref
Original DOI
10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.007
Notice DOI
10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104083
Date
2019-10-26
Title
Corrigendum to “Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies” [Cognition 192 (2019) 1–19]
Reasons
['Erratum']
Work
Cognition 192, (November 2019) (2019)

Schema constants (for re-runners): correction · crossref

03Dispute this notice

If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.