Citation notice #9348 · 2026-08-09 12:17:52.947824+00:00
Don't Let Your Likert Scales Grow Up To Be Visual Analog Scales: Understanding the Relationship Between Number of Response Categories and Measurement Error
cites , Dantlgraber, M, which carries a correction notice dated 2017-03-07. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.
Citing paper Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes
01Evidence
Raw extraction · bibliography line · bibliography index 28
kuhlmann_investigating_2017 APACrefauthors Kuhlmann, T. , Dantlgraber, M. \ Reips, U D. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Investigating measurement equivalence of visual analogue scales and Likert -type scales in Internet -based personality questionnaires Investigating measurement equivalence of visual analogue scales and Likert -type scales in Internet -based personality questionnaires . Behavior Research Methods 49 6 2173--2181 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0850-x APACrefDOI
Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)
kuhlmann_investigating_2017 APACrefauthors Kuhlmann, T., Dantlgraber, M. Reips, U D. APACrefauthors 2017 . Investigating measurement equivalence of visual analogue scales and Likert -type scales in Internet -based personality questionnaires Investigating measurement equivalence of visual analogue scales and Likert -type scales in Internet -based personality questionnaires . Behavior Research Methods 49 6 2173--2181 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0850-x APACrefDOI
02Event
- Type
- Correction
- Source
- Crossref
- Original DOI
- 10.3758/s13428-016-0850-x
- Notice DOI
- 10.3758/s13428-017-0868-8
- Date
- 2017-03-07
- Title
- Erratum to: Investigating measurement equivalence of visual analogue scales and Likert-type scales in Internet-based personality questionnaires
- Reasons
- ['Erratum']
- Work
- , Dantlgraber, M (2017) Behavior Research Methods
03Dispute this notice
If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.