pith. sign in

arxiv: 0707.4638 · v1 · submitted 2007-07-31 · 💱 q-fin.ST · physics.soc-ph

Indication of multiscaling in the volatility return intervals of stock markets

classification 💱 q-fin.ST physics.soc-ph
keywords alphadistributionrecordsreturnscalingbehaviorfindintervals
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The distribution of the return intervals $\tau$ between volatilities above a threshold $q$ for financial records has been approximated by a scaling behavior. To explore how accurate is the scaling and therefore understand the underlined non-linear mechanism, we investigate intraday datasets of 500 stocks which consist of the Standard & Poor's 500 index. We show that the cumulative distribution of return intervals has systematic deviations from scaling. We support this finding by studying the m-th moment $\mu_m \equiv <(\tau/<\tau>)^m>^{1/m}$, which show a certain trend with the mean interval $<\tau>$. We generate surrogate records using the Schreiber method, and find that their cumulative distributions almost collapse to a single curve and moments are almost constant for most range of $<\tau>$. Those substantial differences suggest that non-linear correlations in the original volatility sequence account for the deviations from a single scaling law. We also find that the original and surrogate records exhibit slight tendencies for short and long $<\tau>$, due to the discreteness and finite size effects of the records respectively. To avoid as possible those effects for testing the multiscaling behavior, we investigate the moments in the range $10<<\tau>\leq100$, and find the exponent $\alpha$ from the power law fitting $\mu_m\sim<\tau>^\alpha$ has a narrow distribution around $\alpha\neq0$ which depend on m for the 500 stocks. The distribution of $\alpha$ for the surrogate records are very narrow and centered around $\alpha=0$. This suggests that the return interval distribution exhibit multiscaling behavior due to the non-linear correlations in the original volatility.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.