Remarks on Jurdzinski and Lorys' proof that palindromes are not a Church-Rosser language
classification
💻 cs.LO
keywords
proofchurch-rosserjurdzinskilanguageloryspalindromesalternativeautomata
read the original abstract
In 2002 Jurdzinski and Lorys settled a long-standing conjecture that palindromes are not a Church-Rosser language. Their proof required a sophisticated theory about computation graphs of 2-stack automata. We present their proof in terms of 1-tape Turing machines.We also provide an alternative proof of Buntrock and Otto's result that the set of non-square bitstrings, which is context-free, is not Church-Rosser.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.