pith. sign in

arxiv: 0803.4235 · v1 · submitted 2008-03-29 · ⚛️ physics.gen-ph · physics.ed-ph

Exam fairness

classification ⚛️ physics.gen-ph physics.ed-ph
keywords fairnessclaimsopportunitytreatmentagreedassessmentbiasclear
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

It is widely agreed that exams must be fair; yet what this exactly means is not made clear. One may mean fairness of treatment, but this merely propagates the fairness or unfairness of pre-existing rules. Fairness of opportunity on the other hand necessarily leads to identical grades for everyone, which clearly makes it inapplicable. Neither view is helpful to make decisions on competing claims: fairness of treatment ignores the problem and fairness of opportunity holds all claims to be equally valid. To escape this deadlock one needs an external criterion to replace fairness viewed as student-student comparison. Keywords: assessment; bias; engineering education; examinations; grading; justice; tests

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.