pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 0908.0410 · v1 · submitted 2009-08-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Are GRB optical afterglows relatively brighter at high z?

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.CO
keywords distributionopticalredshifteffectselectionafterglowafterglowsaverage
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The redshift distribution of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is strongly biased by selection effects. We investigate, via Monte Carlo simulations, one possible selection effect that may be modifying the Swift GRB redshift distribution. We show how telescope response times to acquire a GRB redshift may, via the Malmquist effect and GRB optical afterglow brightness distribution, introduce a bias into the average of the observed redshift distribution. It is difficult to reconcile a recently reported correlated trend between telescope response time and average redshifts unless we employ a redshift-dependent optical afterglow distribution. Simulations of this selection effect suggest that GRB optical afterglows may have been either intrinsically brighter early in the Universe or suffered less local host galaxy extinction.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.