Comment: Citation Statistics
classification
📊 stat.ME
cs.DLphysics.soc-ph
keywords
authorscitationgoodmeasuresstatisticsableaccuratelyarxiv
read the original abstract
We discuss the paper "Citation Statistics" by the Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research [arXiv:0910.3529]. In particular, we focus on a necessary feature of "good" measures for ranking scientific authors: that good measures must able to accurately distinguish between authors.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.