On the Power of Unambiguity in Logspace
read the original abstract
We report progress on the \NL vs \UL problem. [-] We show unconditionally that the complexity class $\ReachFewL\subseteq\UL$. This improves on the earlier known upper bound $\ReachFewL \subseteq \FewL$. [-] We investigate the complexity of min-uniqueness - a central notion in studying the \NL vs \UL problem. We show that min-uniqueness is necessary and sufficient for showing $\NL =\UL$. We revisit the class $\OptL[\log n]$ and show that {\sc ShortestPathLength} - computing the length of the shortest path in a DAG, is complete for $\OptL[\log n]$. We introduce $\UOptL[\log n]$, an unambiguous version of $\OptL[\log n]$, and show that (a) $\NL =\UL$ if and only if $\OptL[\log n] = \UOptL[\log n]$, (b) $\LogFew \leq \UOptL[\log n] \leq \SPL$. [-] We show that the reachability problem over graphs embedded on 3 pages is complete for \NL. This contrasts with the reachability problem over graphs embedded on 2 pages which is logspace equivalent to the reachability problem in planar graphs and hence is in \UL.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.