pith. sign in

arxiv: 1002.0145 · v2 · submitted 2010-01-31 · 💻 cs.CC · cs.DM

From Sylvester-Gallai Configurations to Rank Bounds: Improved Black-box Identity Test for Depth-3 Circuits

classification 💻 cs.CC cs.DM
keywords identityranktheoremdepth-3sylvester-gallaiboundsveryblack-box
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We study the problem of identity testing for depth-3 circuits of top fanin k and degree d. We give a new structure theorem for such identities. A direct application of our theorem improves the known deterministic d^{k^k}-time black-box identity test over rationals (Kayal-Saraf, FOCS 2009) to one that takes d^{k^2}-time. Our structure theorem essentially says that the number of independent variables in a real depth-3 identity is very small. This theorem settles affirmatively the stronger rank conjectures posed by Dvir-Shpilka (STOC 2005) and Kayal-Saraf (FOCS 2009). Our techniques provide a unified framework that actually beats all known rank bounds and hence gives the best running time (for every field) for black-box identity tests. Our main theorem (almost optimally) pins down the relation between higher dimensional Sylvester-Gallai theorems and the rank of depth-3 identities in a very transparent manner. The existence of this was hinted at by Dvir-Shpilka (STOC 2005), but first proven, for reals, by Kayal-Saraf (FOCS 2009). We introduce the concept of Sylvester-Gallai rank bounds for any field, and show the intimate connection between this and depth-3 identity rank bounds. We also prove the first ever theorem about high dimensional Sylvester-Gallai configurations over any field. Our proofs and techniques are very different from previous results and devise a very interesting ensemble of combinatorics and algebra. The latter concepts are ideal theoretic and involve a new Chinese remainder theorem. Our proof methods explain the structure of any depth-3 identity C: there is a nucleus of C that forms a low rank identity, while the remainder is a high dimensional Sylvester-Gallai configuration.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.