pith. sign in

arxiv: 1010.2467 · v1 · pith:GDSQ7AIEnew · submitted 2010-10-12 · 🧮 math.CO

A Greedy Partition Lemma for Directed Domination

classification 🧮 math.CO
keywords directeddominationnumberalphagammagraphlemmadenoted
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

A directed dominating set in a directed graph $D$ is a set $S$ of vertices of $V$ such that every vertex $u \in V(D) \setminus S$ has an adjacent vertex $v$ in $S$ with $v$ directed to $u$. The directed domination number of $D$, denoted by $\gamma(D)$, is the minimum cardinality of a directed dominating set in $D$. The directed domination number of a graph $G$, denoted $\Gamma_d(G)$, which is the maximum directed domination number $\gamma(D)$ over all orientations $D$ of $G$. The directed domination number of a complete graph was first studied by Erd\"{o}s [Math. Gaz. 47 (1963), 220--222], albeit in disguised form. In this paper we prove a Greedy Partition Lemma for directed domination in oriented graphs. Applying this lemma, we obtain bounds on the directed domination number. In particular, if $\alpha$ denotes the independence number of a graph $G$, we show that $\alpha \le \Gamma_d(G) \le \alpha(1+2\ln(n/\alpha))$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.