pith. sign in

arxiv: 1106.4247 · v1 · pith:SP3GSVJMnew · submitted 2011-06-21 · 💻 cs.DM

On the gap between ess(f) and cnf_size(f)

classification 💻 cs.DM
keywords falsifyfunctionssizeassignmentsbooleanboundcommonimplicate
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Given a Boolean function f, the quantity ess(f) denotes the largest set of assignments that falsify f, no two of which falsify a common implicate of f. Although ess(f)$ is clearly a lower bound on cnf_size(f) (the minimum number of clauses in a CNF formula for f), Cepek et al. showed that it is not, in general, a tight lower bound. They gave examples of functions f for which there is a small gap between ess(f) and cnf_size(f). We demonstrate significantly larger gaps. We show that the gap can be exponential in n for arbitrary Boolean functions, and Theta(sqrt{n}) for Horn functions, where n is the number of variables of f. We also introduce a natural extension of the quantity ess(f), which we call ess_k(f), which is the largest set of assignments, no k of which falsify a common implicate of f.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.