pith. sign in

arxiv: 1109.5886 · v4 · pith:M2H4YW7Jnew · submitted 2011-09-27 · 🧮 math.AG · math.LO

Non-Archimedean Whitney stratifications

classification 🧮 math.AG math.LO
keywords stratificationst-stratificationswhitneyfieldssubsetsvaluedcertainclasses
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We define "t-stratifications", a strong notion of stratifications for Henselian valued fields $K$ of equi-characteristic 0, and prove that they exist. In contrast to classical stratifications in Archimedean fields, t-stratifications also contain non-local information about the stratified sets. For example, they do not only see the singularities in the valued field, but also those in the residue field. Like Whitney stratifications, t-stratifications exist for different classes of subsets of $K^n$, e.g. algebraic subvarieties or certain classes of analytic subsets. The general framework are definable sets (in the sense of model theory) in a language that satisfies certain hypotheses. We give two applications. First, we show that t-stratifications in suitable valued fields $K$ induce classical Whitney stratifications in $\Bbb R$ or $\Bbb C$; in particular, the existence of t-stratifications implies the existence of Whitney stratifications. This uses methods of non-standard analysis. Second, we show how, using t-stratifications, one can determine the ultra-metric isometry type of definable subsets of $\Bbb Z_p^n$ for $p$ sufficiently big. For those $p$, this proves a conjecture stated in a previous article. In particular, this yields a new, geometric proof of the rationality of Poincar\'e series.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.