pith. sign in

arxiv: 1202.4153 · v1 · pith:WZZNSUKKnew · submitted 2012-02-19 · 🧮 math.HO · math.CA· math.LO

Ten Misconceptions from the History of Analysis and Their Debunking

classification 🧮 math.HO math.CAmath.LO
keywords analysishistorytriumviratedistortionsnumberalembertanachronisticcantor
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The widespread idea that infinitesimals were "eliminated" by the "great triumvirate" of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass is refuted by an uninterrupted chain of work on infinitesimal-enriched number systems. The elimination claim is an oversimplification created by triumvirate followers, who tend to view the history of analysis as a pre-ordained march toward the radiant future of Weierstrassian epsilontics. In the present text, we document distortions of the history of analysis stemming from the triumvirate ideology of ontological minimalism, which identified the continuum with a single number system. Such anachronistic distortions characterize the received interpretation of Stevin, Leibniz, d'Alembert, Cauchy, and others.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.