pith. sign in

arxiv: 1203.3654 · v1 · pith:BD3YQBZQnew · submitted 2012-03-16 · 💻 cs.NI

Comparative Analysis of Congestion Control Algorithms Using ns-2

classification 💻 cs.NI
keywords queuealgorithmsanalysiscomparativecongestionfairflowflows
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:BD3YQBZQ Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{BD3YQBZQ}

Prints a linked pith:BD3YQBZQ badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

In order to curtail the escalating packet loss rates caused by an exponential increase in network traffic, active queue management techniques such as Random Early Detection (RED) have come into picture. Flow Random Early Drop (FRED) keeps state based on instantaneous queue occupancy of a given flow. FRED protects fragile flows by deterministically accepting flows from low bandwidth connections and fixes several shortcomings of RED by computing queue length during both arrival and departure of the packet. Stochastic Fair Queuing (SFQ) ensures fair access to network resources and prevents a busty flow from consuming more than its fair share. In case of (Random Exponential Marking) REM, the key idea is to decouple congestion measure from performance measure (loss, queue length or delay). Stabilized RED (SRED) is another approach of detecting nonresponsive flows. In this paper, we have shown a comparative analysis of throughput, delay and queue length for the various congestion control algorithms RED, SFQ and REM. We also included the comparative analysis of loss rate having different bandwidth for these algorithms.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.