On the Signed (Total) k-Domination Number of a Graph
read the original abstract
Let $k$ be a positive integer and $G=(V,E)$ be a graph of minimum degree at least $k-1$. A function $f:V\rightarrow \{-1,1\}$ is called a \emph{signed $k$-dominating function} of $G$ if $\sum_{u\in N_G[v]}f(u)\geq k$ for all $v\in V$. The \emph{signed $k$-domination number} of $G$ is the minimum value of $\sum_{v\in V}f(v)$ taken over all signed $k$-dominating functions of $G$. The \emph{signed total $k$-dominating function} and \emph{signed total $k$-domination number} of $G$ can be similarly defined by changing the closed neighborhood $N_G[v]$ to the open neighborhood $N_G(v)$ in the definition. The \emph{upper signed $k$-domination number} is the maximum value of $\sum_{v\in V}f(v)$ taken over all \emph{minimal} signed $k$-dominating functions of $G$. In this paper, we study these graph parameters from both algorithmic complexity and graph-theoretic perspectives. We prove that for every fixed $k\geq 1$, the problems of computing these three parameters are all \NP-hard. We also present sharp lower bounds on the signed $k$-domination number and signed total $k$-domination number for general graphs in terms of their minimum and maximum degrees, generalizing several known results about signed domination.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.