pith. sign in

arxiv: 1205.4304 · v1 · pith:MMS4P7GVnew · submitted 2012-05-19 · 📊 stat.OT · cs.DL· physics.soc-ph

In praise of the referee

classification 📊 stat.OT cs.DLphysics.soc-ph
keywords fieldsappliedapproachesbeenbiomedicalconstructivecontinuecontribute
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

There has been a lively debate in many fields, including statistics and related applied fields such as psychology and biomedical research, on possible reforms of the scholarly publishing system. Currently, referees contribute so much to improve scientific papers, both directly through constructive criticism and indirectly through the threat of rejection. We discuss ways in which new approaches to journal publication could continue to make use of the valuable efforts of peer reviewers.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.