pith. sign in

arxiv: 1205.5182 · v3 · pith:53RIOFB7new · submitted 2012-05-23 · 🧬 q-bio.TO · q-bio.PE

A mathematical model of tumor self-seeding reveals secondary metastatic deposits as drivers of primary tumor growth

classification 🧬 q-bio.TO q-bio.PE
keywords primarytumorsecondaryseedingcellsshedctcsdeposits
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:53RIOFB7 Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{53RIOFB7}

Prints a linked pith:53RIOFB7 badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

Two models of circulating tumor cell (CTC) dynamics have been proposed to explain the phenomenon of tumor 'self-seeding', whereby CTCs repopulate the primary tumor and accelerate growth: Primary Seeding, where cells from a primary tumor shed into the vasculature and return back to the primary themselves; and Secondary Seeding, where cells from the primary first metastasize in a secondary tissue and form microscopic secondary deposits, which then shed cells into the vasculature returning to the primary. These two models are difficult to distinguish experimentally, yet the differences between them is of great importance to both our understanding of the metastatic process and also for designing methods of intervention. Therefore we developed a mathematical model to test the relative likelihood of these two phenomena in the subset of tumours whose shed CTCs first encounter the lung capillary bed, and show that Secondary Seeding is several orders of magnitude more likely than Primary seeding. We suggest how this difference could affect tumour evolution, progression and therapy, and propose several possible methods of experimental validation.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.