pith. sign in

arxiv: 1210.0282 · v3 · pith:UH7N2MHNnew · submitted 2012-10-01 · 🧮 math.DS

The current state of fractal billiards

classification 🧮 math.DS
keywords omegabilliardfractaltablecompatibleorbitsrationalresults
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

If D is a rational polygon, then the associated rational billiard table is given by \Omega(D). Such a billiard table is well understood. If F is a closed fractal curve approximated by a sequence of rational polygons, then the corresponding fractal billiard table is denoted by \Omega(F). In this paper, we survey many of the results from [LapNie1-3] for the Koch snowflake fractal billiard \Omega(KS) and announce new results on two other fractal billiard tables, namely, the T-fractal billiard table \Omega(T) (see [LapNie6]) and a self-similar Sierpinski carpet billiard table \Omega(S_a) (see [CheNie]). We build a general framework within which to analyze what we call a sequence of compatible orbits. Properties of particular sequences of compatible orbits are discussed for each prefractal billiard \Omega(KS_n), \Omega(T_n) and \Omega(S_a,n), for n = 0, 1, 2... . In each case, we are able to determine a particular limiting behavior for an appropriately formulated sequence of compatible orbits. Such a limit either constitutes what we call a nontrivial path of a fractal billiard table \Omega(F) or else a periodic orbit of \Omega(F) with finite period. In our examples, F will be either KS, T or S_a. Several of the results and examples discussed in this paper are presented for the first time. We then close with a brief discussion of open problems and directions for further research in the emerging field of fractal billiards.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.