pith. sign in

arxiv: 1301.4028 · v1 · pith:TNKBT7SDnew · submitted 2013-01-17 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph · cs.DL

Do we need the g-index?

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph cs.DL
keywords g-indexdatasetsdifferencelargersampleveryanotherargue
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Using a very small sample of 8 datasets it was recently shown by De Visscher (2011) that the g-index is very close to the square root of the total number of citations. It was argued that there is no bibliometrically meaningful difference. Using another somewhat larger empirical sample of 26 datasets I show that the difference may be larger and I argue in favor of the g-index.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.