pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1303.5082 · v3 · submitted 2013-03-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation

Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade , N. Aghanim , C. Armitage-Caplan , M. Arnaud , M. Ashdown , F. Atrio-Barandela , J. Aumont , C. Baccigalupi
show 235 more authors
A. J. Banday R. B. Barreiro J. G. Bartlett N. Bartolo E. Battaner K. Benabed A. Benoit A. Benoit-Levy J.-P. Bernard M. Bersanelli P. Bielewicz J. Bobin J. J. Bock A. Bonaldi J. R. Bond J. Borrill F. R. Bouchet M. Bridges M. Bucher C. Burigana R. C. Butler E. Calabrese J.-F. Cardoso A. Catalano A. Challinor A. Chamballu H. C. Chiang L.-Y Chiang P. R. Christensen S. Church D. L. Clements S. Colombi L. P. L. Colombo F. Couchot A. Coulais B. P. Crill A. Curto F. Cuttaia L. Danese R. D. Davies R. J. Davis P. De Bernardis A. De Rosa G. de Zotti J. Delabrouille J.-M. Delouis F.-X. Desert C. Dickinson J. M. Diego H. Dole S. Donzelli O. Dore M. Douspis J. Dunkley X. Dupac G. Efstathiou T. A. Ensslin H. K. Eriksen F. Finelli O. Forni M. Frailis E. Franceschi S. Galeotta K. Ganga C. Gauthier M. Giard G. Giardino Y. Giraud-Hiraud J. Gonzalez-Nuevo K. M. Gorski S. Gratton A. Gregorio A. Gruppuso J. Hamann F. K. Hansen D. Hanson D. Harrison S. Henrot-Versille C. Hernandez-Monteagudo D. Herranz S. R. Hildebrandt E. Hivon M. Hobson W. A. Holmes A. Hornstrup W. Hovest K. M. Huffenberger A. H. Jaffe T. R. Jaffe W. C. Jones M. Juvela E. Keihanen R. Keskitalo T. S. Kisner R. Kneissl J. Knoche L. Knox M. Kunz H. Kurki-Suonio G. Lagache A. Lahteenmaki J.-M. Lamarre A. Lasenby R. J. Laureijs C. R. Lawrence S. Leach J. P. Leahy R. Leonardi J. Lesgourgues A. Lewis M. Liguori P. B. Lilje M. Linden-Vernle M. Lopez-Caniego P. M. Lubin J. F. Macias-Perez B. Maffei D. Maino N. Mandolesi M. Maris D. J. Marshall P. G. Martin E. Martinez-Gonzalez S. Masi M. Massardi S. Matarrese F. Matthai P. Mazzotta P. R. Meinhold A. Melchiorri L. Mendes A. Mennella M. Migliaccio S. Mitra M.-A. Miville-Deschenes A. Moneti L. Montier G. Morgante D. Mortlock A. Moss D. Munshi J. A. Murphy P. Naselsky F. Nati P. Natoli C. B. Netterfield H. U. Norgaard-Nielsen F. Noviello D. Novikov I. Novikov I. J. O'Dwyer S. Osborne C. A. Oxborrow F. Paci L. Pagano F. Pajot R. Paladini S. Pandolfi D. Paoletti B. Partridge F. Pasian G. Patanchon H. V. Peiris O. Perdereau L. Perotto F. Perrotta F. Piacentini M. Piat E. Pierpaoli D. Pietrobon S. Plaszczynski E. Pointecouteau G. Polenta N. Ponthieu L. Popa T. Poutanen G. W. Pratt G. Prezeau S. Prunet J.-L. Puget J. P. Rachen R. Rebolo M. Reinecke M. Remazeilles C. Renault S. Ricciardi T. Riller I. Ristorcelli G. Rocha C. Rosset G. Roudier M. Rowan-Robinson J. A. Rubino-Martin B. Rusholme M. Sandri D. Santos M. Savelainen G. Savini D. Scott M. D. Seiffert E. P. S. Shellard L. D. Spencer J.-L. Starck V. Stolyarov R. Stompor R. Sudiwala R. Sunyaev F. Sureau D. Sutton A.-S. Suur-Uski J.-F. Sygnet J. A. Tauber D. Tavagnacco L. Terenzi L. Toffolatti M. Tomasi J. Treguer-Goudineau M. Tristram M. Tucci J. Tuovinen L. Valenziano J. Valiviita B. Van Tent J. Varis P. Vielva F. Villa N. Vittorio L. A. Wade B. D. Wandelt M. White A. Wilkinson D. Yvon A. Zacchei J. P. Zibin A. Zonca
Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords modelsplanckdatainflationinflationarypotentialboundsconstrain
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We analyse the implications of the Planck data for cosmic inflation. The Planck nominal mission temperature anisotropy measurements, combined with the WMAP large-angle polarization, constrain the scalar spectral index to $n_s = 0.9603 \pm 0.0073$, ruling out exact scale invariance at over 5 $\sigma$. Planck establishes an upper bound on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r < 0.11 (95% CL). The Planck data thus shrink the space of allowed standard inflationary models, preferring potentials with V" < 0. Exponential potential models, the simplest hybrid inflationary models, and monomial potential models of degree n > 2 do not provide a good fit to the data. Planck does not find statistically significant running of the scalar spectral index, obtaining $d n_s/d ln k = -0.0134 \pm 0.0090$. Several analyses dropping the slow-roll approximation are carried out, including detailed model comparison and inflationary potential reconstruction. We also investigate whether the primordial power spectrum contains any features. We find that models with a parameterized oscillatory feature improve the fit $\chi^2$ by ~ 10; however, Bayesian evidence does not prefer these models. We constrain several single-field inflation models with generalized Lagrangians by combining power spectrum data with bounds on $f_\mathrm{NL}$ measured by Planck. The fractional primordial contribution of CDM isocurvature modes in the curvaton and axion scenarios has upper bounds of 0.25% or 3.9% (95% CL), respectively. In models with arbitrarily correlated CDM or neutrino isocurvature modes, an anticorrelation can improve $\chi^2$ by approximatively 4 as a result of slightly lowering the theoretical prediction for the $\ell<40$ multipoles relative to the higher multipoles. Nonetheless, the data are consistent with adiabatic initial conditions.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    astro-ph.CO 2018-07 accept novelty 5.0

    Final Planck CMB data confirms the flat 6-parameter ΛCDM model with Ω_c h² = 0.120 ± 0.001, Ω_b h² = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, n_s = 0.965 ± 0.004, τ = 0.054 ± 0.007, H_0 = 67.4 ± 0.5 km/s/Mpc, and no strong evidence for extensions.

  2. The landscape of QCD axion models

    hep-ph 2020-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Review classifies QCD axion models extending the standard mass-coupling window and updates bounds from cosmology, astrophysics, and experiments.