pith. sign in

arxiv: 1305.3146 · v1 · pith:ACIILC4Dnew · submitted 2013-05-14 · 💻 cs.SI · physics.soc-ph

Discriminating Power of Centrality Measures

classification 💻 cs.SI physics.soc-ph
keywords centralitymeasuresverticesattemptcentralitiesconjecturedifferentestrada
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:ACIILC4D Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{ACIILC4D}

Prints a linked pith:ACIILC4D badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

The calculation of centrality measures is common practice in the study of networks, as they attempt to quantify the importance of individual vertices, edges, or other components. Different centralities attempt to measure importance in different ways. In this paper, we examine a conjecture posed by E. Estrada regarding the ability of several measures to distinguish the vertices of networks. Estrada conjectured that if all vertices of a graph have the same subgraph centrality, then all vertices must also have the same degree, eigenvector, closeness, and betweenness centralities. We provide a counterexample for the latter two centrality measures and propose a revised conjecture.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.