pith. sign in

arxiv: 1309.1433 · v2 · pith:WODR4IXWnew · submitted 2013-09-05 · 🧮 math.AP

Optimization under second order constraints: are the finite element discretizations consistent ?

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords constraintsconvergencediscretizationsfinitemeshordersecondunder
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

It is proved in Chon{\'e} and Le Meur (2001) that the problem of minimizing a Dirichlet-like functional of the function $u\_h$ discretized with $P\_1$ Finite Elements, under the constraint that $u\_h$ be convex, cannot converge. Here, we first improve this result by proving that non-convergence is due to the mesh refinment lack of richness, remains local and is true even for any mesh. Then, we investigate the consistency of various natural discretizations ($P\_1$ and $P\_2$) of second order constraints (subharmonicity and convexity) without discussing the convergence. We also numerically illustrate convergence of a method proposed in the literature that is simpler than existing methods.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.