pith. sign in

arxiv: 1309.5434 · v1 · pith:DJXTGYVJnew · submitted 2013-09-21 · 🧮 math.OA

Operator ideals on non-commutative function spaces

classification 🧮 math.OA
keywords mathcalidealsspacescompactsingularstrictlyfunctionnon-commutative
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Suppose $X$ and $Y$ are Banach spaces, and ${\mathcal{I}}$, ${\mathcal{J}}$ are operator ideals (for instance, the ideals of strictly singular, weakly compact, or compact operators). Under what conditions does the inclusion ${\mathcal{I}}(X,Y) \subset {\mathcal{J}}(X,Y)$, or the equality ${\mathcal{I}}(X,Y) = {\mathcal{J}}(X,Y)$, hold? We examine this question when ${\mathcal{I}}, {\mathcal{J}}$ are the ideals of Dunford-Pettis, strictly (co)singular, finitely strictly singular, inessential, or (weakly) compact operators, while $X$ and $Y$ are non-commutative function spaces. Since such spaces are ordered, we also address the same questions for positive parts of such ideals.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.