pith. sign in

arxiv: 1404.7261 · v1 · pith:RHIJJ5FWnew · submitted 2014-04-29 · 🧮 math.CO

Upper bound on cubicity in terms of boxicity for graphs of low chromatic number

classification 🧮 math.CO
keywords alphagraphboundlceilleftrceilrightupper
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The boxicity (respectively cubicity) of a graph $G$ is the minimum non-negative integer $k$, such that $G$ can be represented as an intersection graph of axis-parallel $k$-dimensional boxes (respectively $k$-dimensional unit cubes) and is denoted by $box(G)$ (respectively $cub(G)$). It was shown by Adiga and Chandran (Journal of Graph Theory, 65(4), 2010) that for any graph $G$, $cub(G) \le$ box$(G) \left \lceil \log_2 \alpha \right \rceil$, where $\alpha = \alpha(G)$ is the cardinality of the maximum independent set in $G$. In this note we show that $cub(G) \le 2 \left \lceil \log_2 \chi(G) \right \rceil box(G) + \chi(G) \left \lceil \log_2 \alpha(G) \right \rceil $. In general, this result can provide a much better upper bound than that of Adiga and Chandran for graph classes with bounded chromatic number. For example, for bipartite graphs we get, $cub(G) \le 2 (box(G) + \left \lceil \log_2 \alpha(G) \right \rceil )$. Moreover we show that for every positive integer $k$, there exist graphs with chromatic number $k$, such that for every $\epsilon > 0$, the value given by our upper bound is at most $(1+\epsilon)$ times their cubicity. Thus, our upper bound is almost tight.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.