pith. sign in

arxiv: 1406.5548 · v1 · pith:FVBR2Q24new · submitted 2014-06-20 · 🧮 math.RT

Branching laws on the metaplectic cover of {rm GL}₂

classification 🧮 math.RT
keywords timespairsprasadrestrictionwidetildecasecoveringdichotomy
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Representation theory of $p$-adic groups naturally comes in the study of automorphic forms and one way to understand representations of a group is by restricting to its nice subgroups. D. Prasad studied the restriction for pairs $({\rm GL}_{2}(E), {\rm GL}_{2}(F))$ and $({\rm GL}_{2}(E), D_{F}^{\times})$ where $E/F$ is a quadratic equation and $D_{F}$ is the unique quaternion division algebra, and $D_{F}^{\times} \hookrightarrow {\rm GL}_{2}(E)$. Prasad proved a multiplicity one result and a `dichotomy' relating the restriction for the pairs $({\rm GL}_{2}(E), {\rm GL}_{2}(F))$ and $({\rm GL}_{2}(E), D_{F}^{\times})$ involving the Jacquet-Langlands correspondence. We study a restriction problem involving covering groups. In an analogy to the case of Prasad, we consider pairs $(\widetilde{{\rm GL}_{2}(E)}, {\rm GL}_{2}(F))$ and $(\widetilde{{\rm GL}_{2}(E)}, D_{F}^{\times})$ where $\widetilde{{\rm GL}_{2}(E)}$ is the $\mathbb{C}^{\times}$-metaplectic covering of ${\rm GL}_{2}(E)$. We do not have multiplicity one in this case but there is an analogue of dichotomy.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.