pith. sign in

arxiv: 1409.2575 · v3 · pith:OM5ZTA6Dnew · submitted 2014-09-09 · 💱 q-fin.PM · q-fin.RM

Custom v. Standardized Risk Models

classification 💱 q-fin.PM q-fin.RM
keywords riskfactorsmodelscustomstandardizedtradingdiscussalpha
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We discuss when and why custom multi-factor risk models are warranted and give source code for computing some risk factors. Pension/mutual funds do not require customization but standardization. However, using standardized risk models in quant trading with much shorter holding horizons is suboptimal: 1) longer horizon risk factors (value, growth, etc.) increase noise trades and trading costs; 2) arbitrary risk factors can neutralize alpha; 3) "standardized" industries are artificial and insufficiently granular; 4) normalization of style risk factors is lost for the trading universe; 5) diversifying risk models lowers P&L correlations, reduces turnover and market impact, and increases capacity. We discuss various aspects of custom risk model building.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.