Fewer runs than word length
classification
💻 cs.DM
cs.DScs.FL
keywords
runswordanotherfactorlengthoccurrencesalphabetalternative
read the original abstract
The work takes another look at the number of runs that a string might contain and provides an alternative proof for the bound. We also propose another stronger conjecture that states that, for a fixed order on the alphabet, within every factor of a word there are at most as many occurrences of Lyndon roots corresponding to runs in a word as the length of the factor (only first such occurrences for each run are considered).
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.