pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1501.05947 · v2 · submitted 2015-01-23 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Which galaxy mass estimator can we trust?

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords dynamicalmassmassescompactnessstellargalaxydiscrepancyerrors
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We address the problem that dynamical masses of high-redshift massive galaxies, derived using virial scaling, often come out lower than stellar masses inferred from population fitting to multi-band photometry. We compare dynamical and stellar masses for various samples spanning ranges of mass, compactness and redshift, including the SDSS. The discrepancy between dynamical and stellar masses occurs both at low and high redshifts, and systematically increases with galaxy compactness. Because it is unlikely that stellar masses show systematic errors with galaxy compactness, the correlation of mass discrepancy with compactness points to errors in the dynamical mass estimates which assume homology with massive, nearby ellipticals. We quantify the deviations from homology and propose specific non-virial scaling of dynamical mass with effective radius and velocity dispersion.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.