pith. sign in

arxiv: 1503.06220 · v2 · pith:DAI3BXHNnew · submitted 2015-03-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO

A Physical Approach to the Identification of High-z Mergers: Morphological Classification in the Stellar Mass Domain

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords galaxiesclassificationmassclumpymergersstellarbandcontamination
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

At z>1, the distinction between merging and 'normal' star-forming galaxies based on single band morphology is often hampered by the presence of large clumps which result in a disturbed, merger-like appearance even in rotationally supported disks. In this paper we discuss how a classification based on canonical, non-parametric structural indices measured on resolved stellar mass maps, rather than on single-band images, reduces the misclassification of clumpy but not merging galaxies. We calibrate the mass-based selection of mergers using the MIRAGE hydrodynamical numerical simulations of isolated and merging galaxies which span a stellar mass range of $10^{9.8}$-$10^{10.6}M_{sun}$ and merger ratios between 1:1-1:6.3. These simulations are processed to reproduce the typical depth and spatial resolution of observed HUDF data. We test our approach on a sample of real z~2 galaxies with kinematic classification into disks or mergers and on ~100 galaxies in the HUDF field with photometric/spectroscopic redshift between 1.5$\leqslant z \leqslant$3 and $M>10^{9.4}M_{sun}$. We find that a combination of the asymmetry $A_{MASS}$ and $M_{20, MASS}$ indices measured on the stellar mass maps can efficiently identify real (major) mergers with $\lesssim$20% contamination from clumpy disks in the merger sample. This mass-based classification cannot be reproduced in star-forming galaxies by $H-$band measurements alone, which instead result in a contamination from clumpy galaxies that can be as high as 50%. Moreover, we find that the mass-based classification always results in a lower contamination from clumpy galaxies than an $H-$band classification, regardless of the depth of the imaging used (e.g., CANDELS vs. HUDF).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.